|
|
| Child Access or visitation rights occur when the children who primarily live with one parent visit the other parent. Even if a parent does not have custody of their children, that parent can have access visits on a regular timetable to ensure their relationship with the child is maintained. In addition to visits, access includes the right to inquire about and obtain information about your children’s health, welfare, and education from third parties like doctors and schools. A parent’s right to access is legislated by the Children’s Law Reform Act, is not suspended upon separation of the parties (as custody can be), but is subject to the best interests of the children.A common access schedule is alternate weekends from Friday evenings to Sunday evenings as well as one or two weeknights per week (or sometimes overnight visits) with the parent not having primary care and control of the children. In addition to regular access, holidays are often split as equally as possible, although summer access visits normally range from two to four weeks, and determination of an access routine is subject to the children’s and parents’ schedules. |
| How is Access Decided? |
| Many parents are able to resolve access issues between themselves. If the issue of access is left for a judge to decide, the judge will decide the issue based on what is in the best interests of the children. Although the “best interests of the child” test has been criticized as being too vague, it is still employed as a primary guideline in determining access issues.
|
| Best Interests
Like custody, when access issues are to be decided by a judge, the judge will focus on what’s in the best interests of the children. Section 24(2) of the Children’s Law Reform Act specifically legislates that the court shall consider all of the children’s needs and circumstances including the following: |
- the love, affection and emotional ties between the child and,
- each person entitled to or claiming custody of or access to the child,
- other members of the child’s family who reside with the child, and
- persons involved in the child’s care and upbringing;
- the child’s views and preferences, if they can be reasonably ascertained;
- the length of time the child has lived in a stable home environment;
- the ability and willingness of each person applying for custody of the child to provide the child with guidance and education, the necessaries of life and any special needs of the child;
- any plans proposed for the child’s care and upbringing;
- the permanence and stability of the family unit with which it is proposed that the child will live;
- the ability of each person applying for custody of or access to the child to act as a parent; and
- the relationship by blood or through an adoption order between the child and each person who is a party to the application.
Although a parent who does not receive custody usually receives access, no person has an absolute right to access. Most judges and parents view access as a joint right of a parent and a child and accept that there should be regular and frequent access unless a parent has forfeited such right by misconduct or such access poses a risk to the child. The courts usually apply a policy promoting maximum contact between a child and an access parent, where practical, and an access arrangement is usually structured to take into account both parents’ and the children’s schedules.
Top
Factors in Deciding Access
In assessing the children’s best interests, the courts will look at many factors before making a final determination. The weight given to any factor will vary in each case, but courts tend to focus on the status quo. Some of the factors looked at are the following:
- Age of the Child. Children’s needs and ability to deal with extended access and travel change as children age.
- Parent’s Conduct and Lifestyle. This is usually only relevant insofar as it affects a person’s ability to meet a child’s needs while they are together.
- Parent’s Health. This may become relevant if it affects a person’s ability to meet a child’s needs.
- Status Quo. Courts are reluctant to change ongoing access arrangements that seem to be in a child’s best interests just because one of the parents changes his or her mind.
- Welfare of the Child. It is generally in the best interests of the child to develop and maintain a relationship with both parents. The child’s welfare doesn’t necessarily match that of the parent. It is typically in the bests interests of the child to continue an established access routine unless such access no longer meets a child’s interests.
- Wishes of the Child. The Court may consider the child’s preferences when they can be reasonably determined. In assessing the importance of the child’s wishes, the court considers issues such as how firm the wishes are, how mature the child is, and whether a parent has influenced the wishes. As a general rule, the wishes of a child under 10 years old will not be given much consideration.
- Wishes of the Custodial Parent. The custodial parent’s wishes will be considered, but they will usually not be followed if they are not in the best interests of the child.
Top |
| Common Access Problems |
In attempting to negotiate an agreement about access, there are many details to address, including the following:
- What time does access start, and who is responsible for dropping off the kids?
- What time does access finish, and who is responsible for picking up the kids?
- How many days per week/month will there be access?
- Who can accompany the other parent when they pick-up or drop-off the kids?
- Where will access be exercised?
- Who will be present during access visits?
- What telephone contact will the custodial parent have during access visits?
- What if a parent wants to increase or decrease the access time?
- If access time is missed, will there be make-up time? How will it be decided?
After an access routine has been established, disagreements or complaints can arise because you still have to deal with a spouse or ex-spouse from whom you have separated and/or divorced. Each parent can have complaints about access visits.
Common complaints of an access parent are:
- the children aren’t ready to go at the pick-up times
- the children don’t have enough or the right clothes for access
- the custodial parent independently scheduled a children’s activity during access time
- the custodial parent withholds access without prior reasonable notice
- the custodial parent interferes with access by calling frequently
- the custodial parent doesn’t arrange make-up access times
Common complaints of a custodial parent are:
- the access parent is late picking up or returning the kids
- the access parent doesn’t show up for scheduled access visits
- the children appear uncared for when returning for access visits (e.g. dirty diaper, dirty clothes, complaining they’re hungry, etc.)
- the children act out against the custodial parent when returning from access visits
- the access parent talks to the kids about court proceedings between the spouses
With the help of a Zeidman family lawyer, you can address access issues with confidence and reduce the possibility of problems arising after a schedule has been set.
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Testimonials |
Thank you so much for taking my case. When I first came to you, I was in such a deep hole I thought I would never get out. Other lawyers refused to take my case, but you agreed to step in and got me an order for support when others said it wasn’t possible. I was beyond shocked when you were able to get me the settlement within a few months that I had been after for years. I can’t thank you enough for all your great work.
I wanted to send this card to thank you for all your hard work during my divorce. You were always there for me (only a call or email away), and you gave me the confidence to fight for my rights and for my children. We all thank you for getting us the closure we wanted and for helping us set the stage for bright futures.
Initially, I was concerned that hiring a lawyer would only increase the stress and expense of my divorce. However, you put me at ease right from the start with your frank approach and “telling it like it is”. You were always accessible and always came up with ideas to help resolve things instead of creating more conflict whenever roadblocks appeared. I wanted to thank you for candour, the results, and for helping me get on with my new life.
Mr. Zeidman, in the three years since my separation, I had two other lawyers, neither of whom was able to make much progress with my custody and property division case. But when you agreed to be my lawyer, things changed. By shifting the focus on my children and their best interests, you were able to get me sole custody, support, and a fair equalization payment shortly followed. You knew when to fight, what to fight about, and how to persuade my husband, his lawyer and the judges – and throughout all of it, you were always encouraging and supportive. I am forever grateful for your services.
Mr. Zeidman, you and your staff were professional and extremely supportive to me throughout my custody battle for my children. Thank you for helping me get my children back and for being so kind the whole time.
I was scared to go to court, and I was prepared to settle for almost anything just to avoid it. You told me that my husband knew that, and he was using that to try to get me to agree to a “lowball” offer. You explained my options, their advantages and disadvantages, and you helped me get over my fear of court by demystifying the process and giving me confidence in my case. When we went to the Case Conference and I saw how the judge agreed with your assessment, my confidence grew even more. Because of you, a settlement was reached that gave me and my children much more than I expected was possible. Thank you for your kind words and your efforts. I would recommend you to anyone who is going through a divorce, and I have already referred two of my friends to your office.
|
|
 |
|
|
